Forum:
god
all these angels in my head
all my demons
cold and dead
heaitate.......to liberate......my hate
to much pain,to much joy
to contemplate,
walk the line, walk the path......
watch it obliverate
ash to ash, its just my life for you to muipulate
make me see how i believe and trusted you
how you stayed and betrayed...and didnt follow though
all my prayers that i gave to get
faith renewed
diminshed time in my life damm.......
if we only knew.........
give them hope
give them faith
yet you still resist
they call you god
but your a fraud
cause YOU DONT EXIST
sorry if my poem offends anyone
I was going over the poem again, and this part slightly confuses me:
"give them hope
give them faith
yet you still resist
they call you god
but your a fraud
cause YOU DONT EXIST"
I don't quite understand what you meant by "you still resist". Resist what? In what way? Also, for the line "they call you god", you may want to capitalize "god" as it is the name given by those who believe in him, a title. Just a thought.
Im with Trixy. This is a much better poem. You do a much better job of adhering to a sort of rhyme scheme. It definitely reminds me of the XTC song Dear God. Basically, the author sends a letter to God, asserting that they do not believe in God. A spiffy kind of paradox, presenting the question Why does one address a God they dont believe in? It makes for interesting discussion. That aside, here are some other language problems that Trixy skipped over.
Line 5: You use to, the preposition indicating direction (or the first part of an infinitive), when you probably meant to use too, the adverb indicating a higher degree.
Line 9: Its is the possessive form of It. You need to use an apostrophe to make the contraction Its from It and Is. You can get away with omitting the apostrophe in words like dont and didnt (lines 21 and 11) because the fear of confusion with another word isnt so much of a problem.
Line 14: Damn with an N, not damm. As a note, dam is the thing that beavers build.
Line 20: Same problem as line 9. Your is the possessive form of You. It should read youre (as in "you are a fraud").
There are still some discrepancies in the measure, but that is not entirely uncommon in modern poetry, so Ill not pick on it much. Im often guilty of it myself.
Speaking of me TRIXY! When are you going to critique my poems? What!? They arent worthy of your attention or something? :P
The first thing that really stood out to me was the over-use of ellipsis in this poem, and the incorrect use of them, as well. Also, an ellipsis only has three points in it "..." like so.
Another problem, as with your last poem, was the spelling errors:
"heaitate"
"obliverate"
"muipulate"
And there is inconsistancy in tenses in this line:
"make me see how i believe and trusted you"
That said, I definately like this poem more than the last. Even though I don't agree with the content, I definately think that this piece of writing shows a lot more promise. Keep up the good work!